- Oneplus benchmarks deleted geekbench allegations install#
- Oneplus benchmarks deleted geekbench allegations full#
- Oneplus benchmarks deleted geekbench allegations android#
Oneplus benchmarks deleted geekbench allegations install#
Who cares that the A10 might be 50% faster than the A9, if the vast majority of iPhone users are always running out of space and can't install any big, powerful demanding app without compromising? Who decides to ship the device with so little storage and RAM? Who decides to keep going with TN Panels on the MBAir? Who decides to use spinning hard drives on machines costing hundreds of dollars? Who decides to keep selling computers that aren't updated since 2012?
Oneplus benchmarks deleted geekbench allegations full#
This is why people saying that Apple has run out of talent and ideas are full of BS and can't grasp the obvious. The latest note 7, the same phone as the s7 under a different name for a higher price (that the usual suspects are praising as innovative, astroturfing and ignorance into one) already is surpassed on any real task and performance that simulates real world usage against the 6s. The A9 and A9X are outstanding achievements.
Oneplus benchmarks deleted geekbench allegations android#
Apple's talent made the iPhone out-perform pretty much all Android flagship's multitasking, despite having a fraction of the available RAM. Apple's talent was able to create and ship the fastest performing storage solution on any mobile device (fact: check any benchmarks that measures more than 1 channel).
The talent and innovation is all there, stronger then ever. Why is basic memory still a crippling 16 GB? So, why does it has 3 GB instead of 4 or, god forbid, using that cash to something useful as cornering the industry's 6 GB chips, as Apple used to? At this point, due to economies of scale, the cost of putting 3GB of RAM instead of 4 is peanuts, and due to Apple's scale, costs would've come down even faster. That's why the products are missing something. (16 GB is enough! We do it for the people!) We have the best, most "sensitive" designer on the planet going ape sh*t without Steve being there to tame him, and the marketing "guy" spreading all the BS he wants too. Now we have the best bean counter on the planet, a cold hearted SOB that could bring a supply chain worth in the trillions to its knees, as a CEO. The issue is that when Steve was alive, there was this balance, that put those talents on a fantastic equilibrium. As a company, Apple also has perhaps the best people of the whole industry. It is well known, since like forever, that Apple has by fair the best engineers of the tech industry, be it how the iPhone's hardware performs, to Safari's javascript performance on iOS, to do something as massive/almost impossible as start a maps service from the ground up, to the amazing transition to lightning and how great it has been, to how great iOS security really is (check ) and so on, not to mention the platform's strength.
0 kommentar(er)
